Digital Wallets – It could be an all or nothing argument for adoption

Maybe you’ve seen it…if not I have posted it above. It is the image of an iPhone as a swiss army knife. With seemingly unending utility and potential the mobile platform is being touted as the future of…well just about everything in banking. On March 6, 2012 Apple  was granted a new patent for a technology they are calling iWallet. Looking at the proposed functionality Apple has once again done what they do best;  enter the market after the innovators (think GoogleWallet) with, in my opinion, a substantially better offering. Better in that it goes beyond simple payments to allow you to take control of your payment cards directly on your iPhone. Meaning you will be able to get statements, balances other information and transactions beyond simple point of sale transactions. The release of the iWallet has not been announced but I suspect it will not be long in coming and will complement an NFC enabled iPhone.

I am a fan of mobile technologies and no one on the planet can argue the ubiquity of smart phones. I also think that Apple entering into the digital wallet space will be great for pushing the concept forward and help it gain wider acceptance and will probably help with the setting of standards in the space. Having said that I think that manufactures of leather products do not have to stop production on wallets just yet. Even with the worlds most valuable company behind the concept and despite the wishes of mobile zealots there are a significant number of issues to overcome before the smartphone can truly replace the wallet and achieve high level of adoption and use.

It basically comes down to the fact that we all have more in our wallets then payment cards. The ability to win the brewing war in the digital wallet space may boil down to winning hearts and minds related to the continued need to stuff things into a leather receptacle and put it in our back pockets. I would love to operate with only a smart phone however this is not possible. Those who focus as much attention on digitizing the other uses of a wallet beyond payments will more than likely be the winner.

For example. Scotiabank, one of Canada’s leading banks, offers a rewards program tied to offering points to redeem for rewards with a nationwide movie theatre chain. This is an extremely successful partnership for both the bank and the theatre and is one of the more popular rewards programs. They offer a mobile application that allows you to link your movie points card which provides extra functionality to you via their mobile channel. One of the key features is the ability to use your phone to collect points and discounts via the mobile application. The only drawback is that the mobile app cannot be used with the movie theatres self service points of sale. This means to redeem your points or get discounts you still need to carry your rewards card…in your wallet.

Cash will be around for a while. It is hard to covertly slip a twenty to a door man by bumping phones. The storage of cash, and for that matter attaining cash, will require a wallet and a bank card for the near future. Digital wallets might be able to store your debit/cash card information and may even be able to transmit the details digitally via NFC. The issue is that the retrofitting of thousands of ATM’s will be required prior to you retiring your bank card and feel secure about it.

Beyond any of this all of us can open our wallets right now and identify any number of items that digital wallets cannot replace currently. The ubiquity of the smart phone cannot be argued the utility of the smart phone as a complete wallet offering is still in question. Wallets transcend payments and due to that everyone will have to assess how and when they use digital wallets. If any one company is going to own this market they will have to address not only payments but everything else people use wallets for.

The death of the teller was greatly exaggerated during the introduction of ATM and online banking. If anything people just banked more via the new channels, not picking one over the other. I believe the same will be said over digital wallets in the payments space. A large number of people will get it for the cool factor, for the convenience, and maybe because a few of their favourite stores will be bold enough to accept only digital wallet payments but the plastic and cash will be around for a long time to come until the wallet can be 100% replaced and the infrastructure both POS and ATM have been updated to interact with the digital wallet. Apple’s concept does take it a step further then a simple payments platform however there is still room for improving the digital wallet concept and substantial opportunity for new products to support it (NFC house keys, digital gym memberships, NFC car keys, digital government ID’s).

Banks looking to capitalize in digital wallet space or mobile payments in general should be watching how standards are being defined, assessing the security of the application and, most importantly, move beyond the hype of mobile payments and assess the want or need for another payment method from their customer base. I believe there are better ways for banks to spend their time and energy in the mobile space while they wait for digital wallet functionality and supporting infrastructure to mature.

  Like This Post

2 thoughts on “Digital Wallets – It could be an all or nothing argument for adoption

  1. Oh my God, I just shot Coca-Cola out my nose when I saw Ron Paul’s name on ANY list for Treasury. You mean the SAME Ron Paul who was vocal opponent of the Bailout? The SAME Ron Paul who has never voted for a tax or spending bill? The SAME Ron Paul that is as small government as they come? I think it would be awesome, but just is NOT even the remotest of possibilities. Ron is also a pretty big black sheep in the Republican Party as he is the only consistent Republican vote against everythign to do with Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Let’s be very clear, Obama is a far left, big government liberal Democrat. He is fully indoctrinated with the notion of of the government “spreading the wealth.” He thrives on the prospect of a huge government complex providing all things good. Health care, housing, justice, child care, abortions, personal safety, cash and everything else. Ron Paul will absolutely not have any part of this, even if for some reason they begged him to take a role in this administration as a reach across the aisle.


  2. I believe the adoption will not be overnght as George says but the rate of adoption cannot be linked to the speed of change which applied when ATMs arrived. My view is that bankers should not stand on the sidelines but get involved in testing the new technologies – the bankers old habits of standing on the sidelines waiting to see what happens don’t apply in the new paradigm.